[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: <eyebeam><blast> carnival and lent
> Paul, you are right that all human interaction is symbolic. My
>notion of symbolic events makes that point in its attempt to blur the
>distinction between cognition and action, between language (including
>audiovisuality) and "just doing it." This distinction becomes more and
>more muddied anyway, once acts in the world are performed at a keyboard
>or joystick or other telematic relay by manipulating symbols on a
Yet the blurring of action and symbolic takes place in favor of the
symbolic - the collective institution of a lie in the form of
law/language/reason which only masks the arbitrary impulse from chaos
which "precedes" even "Desire."
> I like art pieces that deal with the intersection and
>interaction of on and offscreen life--whenever there is a difference. I
>spend hours everyday at my computer and more hours (minimum of three
>hours 2 or 3xper week) driving, that is in cyber- or protocyberspace.
Paradoxical movement of reason, efficiency, technology toward the
erasure of the event . . . finally freeing itself - reason recapitualing
in reverse what it always knew it was: science leads to (is) abolute
"madness" - Bataille's animal night. So many times it hits us just
there: in the car on the highway/parkinglot/suburb of the contemporarty
desert of the possible.
"Alcohol affords a certain brand of lucidity"
clint ashcraft (1969-1994)
> Also,the notion of different thought patterns is astute. I
>find little "body" clues help in following the direction of others
>unfamiliar expressions and assumptions. I think those clues are present
>in a poster's presentational style and in content reflecting on his or
>her life situation.
Can we free the impulse - free indirect discourse - the lived situation.
Pataphysics and surrealism not reincorporated into the safe symbolic but
as practices of a future being.
A philosophical/psychoanalytic/poetic practice of
real-imaginary-symbolic (phantasm-signifier-simulacra) falters before
the void (1888, 1945, 1972, 1998...). One more step Frenchmen . . .
If the now safe and accepted profession of "artist" already threatens to
eclipse its (non)purpose, perhaps internet art will perform the final
Nietzschean/Klossowskian conspiracy of enfolding art too into the
industrial/institutional symbolic thus unleashing the forces it was
shepherding oh so carefully.
Eve Andree Laramee wrote:
> reminded me of was how the _machine-assisted I or you_ is frequently
>devoid of vulnerability, which ties into your reference to privacy. The
>public aspect of internet exchanges can strip the vulnerabilities from
>our virtualities. Our vulnerabilties are part of what makes us human,
>no? Perhaps this has something to do with your stated
>> difficulty engaging in ungrounded or unsituated,
>>impersonal ideas (though they are a part
>>of life I accept in print.)
>It seems that public postings revealing uncertainties or intimacies or
>subjectivities or even sometimes creativities are often confronted with
>silence. We tend to talk around art, not with it.
>Discourse on the internet has different "interference patterns" than
>spoken words and printed "hard text" because of our differing ways of
>cognition, differing ways of working which get "frozen" into a state
>somewhere between solid and liquid when they move from private to
>All best regards,
>Eve Andree Laramee
Can we get free of ourselves - even on this abstract machine. Try. A
message. An image appears on the screen. And tears. Even liquid crystal
cries. But what was torn on paper becomes burnt carbon. You can smell
But where will it be censored - on the machine or in the mind. Or will
it sneak through unnoticed and grow. A viral affect.
In a trance
daggers come from my eyes
on the attack
gravity has left the earth
I hold it down
just as the ridiculous escapes me
My fierce love
melts to a kiss
for a moment
caught off guard
so much more in its rarity
the eternal is revealed
A victim of time
cries to sleep
if not bored
I'm still waiting
to bite through my jaw
and the lazy lack
of this world I escape
a critical forum for artistic practice in the network
texts are the property of individual authors
to unsubscribe, send email to email@example.com
with the following single line in the message body:
information and archive at http://www.eyebeam.org
Eyebeam Atelier/X Art Foundation http://www.blast.org