This configuration which mazes between the utopian and distopian perhaps
represents a place of "future" places, overlays of images, territory,
names, desires, actions. Perhaps no distance is covered but new terrain is
(un/dis)covered by (re)thinking. (Re)cognition. The mazing is a result of
the compromise between supposed linearity and of simultaneity. It is not a
duty given to artists, but a propensity, a burst of wandering among (or
falling through) cultivated ciphers.
>I think that the habit of mind which is prompted by computational tools
>has always been present, but has used different tools to model itself and
>different terms to express itself. Geological, mechanical,
>psychological,
>mathematical. I want to be allowed to use all of those terms in a culture
>with enough depth to recognize themany ways in which they
>are, not rarified and part of the discussions of intellectual elit, but
>present and even normal.
"And why shouldn't I invent some way, however fantastic and contrived, of
talking about something, without someone having to ask whether I'm
qualified to talk like that?" (Deleuze, Negotions)
>I agree with John Beckman about the
>sadness which surrounds this hard work on the "Chromed" object.
The matrix of the banal explodes into grand glittering minutiae.
Eve Andr=E9e Laram=E9e
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------
>a forum on spatial articulations, perspectives, and procedures
>texts are the property of individual authors
>for information, email majordomo@forum.documenta.de with
>the following line in the message body: info blast
>archive at http://www.documenta.de/english/blasta.htm
>or http://www.documenta.de/deutsch/blasta.htm
>documenta X Kassel and http://www.documenta.de 1997
>-------------------------------------------------------------
>